SEARCH 
Global Services » Destinations » Detailed Story
In a City to Be Named Later
What's the best way to fill the gaps in knowledge that inevitably occur in the process of sourcing cities in far-flung global destinations?
RELATED CONTENT
ARTICLES
The Common Key to Offshoring and Real Estate - Location
Sourcing the Sourcing Advisors
Destination: Monterrey, Mexico
Finding New Frontiers
Attrition
BLOGS
Smoke Without Fire? Buyer Without Seller?
Is it time for "Diet" Lean Six Sigma ?
Elections, Immigration and Emotions
Nominate Top Cities for Global Sourcing
The changing landscape – opportunities and challenges

Go to Destinations Home Page

Choosing a global services destination is fraught with all kinds of challenges, not the least of which is finding good answers to basic questions. Sometimes differences in terms, data capture or culture make apples to apples comparisons more of an ideal than a reality.

Even comprehensive research reports may overlook an issue that could determine the success or failure of the sourcing initiative. Besides, you may believe that your requirements are unique — a mindset often ridiculed by the research community.

We, however, respect that attitude. Assuming, of course, that you’re not out to re-invent the wheel — especially when your goal is to cut cost. How and where do you start — especially if you’re new to sourcing or locating global services?

In a typical onshore outsourcing case, a decision on whether one should outsource a set of processes or run them in a shared-services center usually precedes the service provider selection process. In the global services scenario, the problem is that many of the functions in the overall sourcing process — such as whether to conduct a process in-house or outsource, choosing a provider and location — often fall off the sequence. And that impacts the time and energy needed to complete each of these functions, and not surprisingly the cart is sometimes in front of the horse.

A sure way to throw off the project timing is to decide midstream that the project should be conducted in a captive, company-owned facility that doesn’t yet exist — in a city to be named later. As you might expect, due diligence on location takes a lot more time in a captive scenario.

Country vs. City Approach

As a discipline, offshoring is maturing. In countries such as India, China and Russia — which are obviously enormous geographies with massive population — much more macro-economic information exists than micro — or city-centric — detail. A small Eastern European country is a different story altogether — there’s often much less information available, at least in English.

Here are some common parameters of location sourcing classified on the basis of whether they are primarily country-centric or city-centric:
    More or less same for all the cities in a country
     
  Legal system
     
  Business environment
     
    Moderately similar for cities within a country
     
  Availability of raw manpower
     
  Infrastructure quality
     
  Risk
     
    Very distinct for cities within a country
     
  Availability of skilled manpower
     
  People costs
     
  Real-estate costs
     
  Maturity as an offshoring destination/ecosystem

Digg Del.icio.us E-mail 
   [1] 2 
TALK BACK
     Name:  *  Email:  *
  Subject:   
Comment:  *
  
PRINT EDITION
View Digital Magazine
Back Issues
Subscribe

About Global Services  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise with Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS  |  Write for Global Services

PCQuest | Dataquest | Voice&Data | Living Digital | DQ Channels | DQ Week | CIOL | CyberMedia Events
Cyber Astro | CyberMedia Digital | CyberMedia Dice | CyberMedia | BioSpectrum | BioSpectrum Asia
Copyright © 2008 GLOBAL SERVICES all rights reserved