| Wednesday, May 28, 2008 | |
| FAO to Achieve Strategic Objectives | |
| Lisa Ross | |
| The No. 1 reason for companies to consider outsourcing finance back-office functions is the need for cost reductions; however, we are seeing a myriad of additional drivers compelling companies to consider, and ultimately choose outsourcing as an operational alternative | |
|
|
|
|
I can point to several examples of existing contracts fitting exactly into the categories listed above. I find a few, in particular, to be extremely relevant so that readers of this article may feel “ME TOO” when understanding these sourcing initiatives. Using FAO to Facilitate Operations Post Merger GSK needed a breakthrough strategy. It could not deliver on its internal cost-reduction target of 40 percent by itself. GSK also could not drive further standardization in-house. Furthermore, the company did not have the capability to deliver on vast, transformative-process improvements, given the cultural issue of managing 18,000 employees across different business units. To meet its needs, in Jan. ’05, GSK began a five-year FAO engagement with service provider Genpact. Outsourced processes include: Finance and accounting, analytics, e-learning, re-engineering and fraud data analysis. The geographic scope for services includes the U.K. and the U.S. as well as some services for GSK’s global finance functions. The outcome of GSK’s engagement with FAO thus far has been significant due to the achievement of the following results in just two years time:
GSK expects to realize a payback on its outsourcing investment within just three years. Using FAO to Consolidate Finance Functions The company ultimately chose to outsource its finance functions for:
In early 2006, Unilever Europe entered into an FAO contract with IBM that is expected to last seven years, including an initial two-year transition period, which is now in the process of being completed. Outsourced services include: Accounts payable, bill-to-cash, travel and expense, fixed assets, credit and collections, and general accounting. This initiative thus far is seen as a groundbreaking success by Unilever Europe, and serves as a key enabler for its company-wide change program, having already delivered against the expected benefits. The company also believes that this approach to FAO provides a solid basis for the future service in Europe, as this could be a model that can be leveraged elsewhere within Unilever. Additionally, by de-capitalizing, Unilever Europe has access to a flexible delivery model that accommodates evolving business requirements, while ongoing investment in people, infrastructure and technology is performed by its outsourcing partner. The Supply Side Angles to Meet Demand Lisa is the CEO and founder of FAO Research, an independent research firm focused exclusively on the FAO and procurement outsourcing markets. As a leading analyst in the outsourcing industry for more than 12 years, she works closely with customers, advisors and suppliers of outsourcing services. |
|
|
| |
| Related Resources |
![]() |
![]() |



Cost-related benefits will always be the top of mind reason to outsource services. However, in some of the current Finance and Accounting Outsourcing (FAO) contracts, it has been noticed that apart from just cost savings, the outsourcing of services helped in accomplishing a few customer objectives such as:









